A 1 MW (megawatt) solar plant in India sits at a useful inflection point for investors. It is large enough to qualify as an Independent Power Producer (IPP) asset, small enough to deploy on a single industrial rooftop or a 4–5 acre land parcel, and bankable across all three financing buckets — capital expenditure (CAPEX) self-funded, operating expenditure (OPEX) developer-funded, and group captive co-investment. In 2026, an all-in 1 MW solar project costs ₹3.5–₹4 crore at the kit gate, generates 1.5–1.7 million units (kWh) a year in good-irradiance states, and clears an Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of 15–22% post-Accelerated Depreciation (AD) for a CAPEX investor. The maths gets tighter for OPEX/Power Purchase Agreement (PPA) developers but the structure stays bankable.
This guide is for the High Net-worth Individual (HNI), the family office, the industrial buyer evaluating a behind-the-meter asset, and the corporate treasury team eyeing 1 MW as the first block of a 10–50 MW IPP portfolio. It covers the full economics — CAPEX breakdown, generation, tariffs, financing, IRR and Net Present Value (NPV) maths, and the exit options that decide whether your 1 MW is an annuity or a tradeable asset.
Direct answer. A 1 MW solar plant in India in 2026 costs ₹3.5–₹4 crore all-in (₹35–₹40 per Watt), generates 1.5–1.7 million kWh a year at 17–19% Capacity Utilisation Factor (CUF), and earns 15–22% IRR for a CAPEX investor claiming Accelerated Depreciation, or 12–15% IRR for an OPEX/PPA developer. Payback runs 4–6 years with AD, 6–8 without. NPV at a 10% discount over 25 years sits at ₹6–₹9 crore positive for Rajasthan or Gujarat sites.
If you are deciding between owning the asset on your own balance sheet, signing a PPA with a developer, or pooling into a group captive vehicle, the numbers in this guide will give you the negotiation floor for each of those three structures.
The 1 MW Solar Investment Landscape in India 2026
India crossed 100 GW (gigawatts) of installed solar capacity in 2025 and is targeting 280 GW by 2030 under the National Electricity Plan. Behind that headline, the 1 MW segment is the unit of account for IPPs, distributed renewable developers, and corporates building Renewable Energy 100 (RE100) compliance portfolios. Solar Energy Corporation of India (SECI) auctions clear at ₹2.50–₹2.85 per kWh for utility-scale tranches above 100 MW, but the 1 MW corporate PPA and open-access markets clear at meaningfully higher tariffs — which is where the investor margin sits.
Three forces define 2026 economics. Module prices have stabilised at US$0.10–0.12 per Watt at the factory gate, per BloombergNEF (BNEF) module index data, after the 2023–24 oversupply. Domestic Approved List of Models and Manufacturers (ALMM) compliance under Ministry of New and Renewable Energy (MNRE) adds 8–12% to module cost over imported lines. And financing has loosened — Indian Renewable Energy Development Agency (IREDA) is funding 70–75% of project cost at 9.5–11% for tenures of 10–12 years, which is the cheapest debt available to a non-utility solar investor.
The 1 MW Solar Investor’s 7-Variable Model
Every bankable 1 MW investment decision reduces to seven variables. We call this The 1 MW Solar Investor’s 7-Variable Model — it is the framework our commercial team uses to underwrite every project we build, and the same one used by lenders at IREDA, Power Finance Corporation (PFC), and REC Limited when sizing debt against an EPC quote.
| # | Variable | What it controls | Typical 2026 range |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Site (irradiance + land/roof) | Annual generation, CUF | 1.3–1.8 mn kWh/year |
| 2 | Tech (modules + inverter + tracker) | Performance Ratio (PR), degradation | PR 78–82%; deg 0.45–0.55%/yr |
| 3 | Tariff (PPA / open access / captive) | Revenue per kWh | ₹3–₹6/kWh |
| 4 | Financing (debt-equity mix) | Equity IRR, Debt Service Coverage Ratio (DSCR) | 70:30 to 75:25 debt:equity |
| 5 | Accelerated Depreciation (AD) | Year-1 tax shield | ₹1.3–₹1.5 cr saving |
| 6 | Operations and Maintenance (O&M) | Lifetime opex | ₹0.5–₹0.7 lakh/MW/month |
| 7 | Exit (hold / sell / refinance) | Terminal value | 6–8× Year-25 EBITDA |
Variables 1, 3 and 5 drive 80% of equity IRR. Variable 4 decides whether the deal is do-able at all — without IREDA, PFC or commercial bank debt, a 1 MW investor needs ₹3.5+ crore of equity, which is the wall most HNI investors hit. Variables 2 and 6 separate a good asset from a poor one over the 25-year life. Variable 7 separates an annuity holder from a portfolio builder. For a focused walkthrough of the underlying maths, see how to calculate solar ROI.
CAPEX Breakdown for 1 MW Solar Plant
The all-in 1 MW EPC quote of ₹3.5–₹4 crore breaks down into four cost buckets. The numbers below assume a Direct Current (DC) capacity of 1.15 MWp (megawatt-peak) — the standard DC-over-Alternating Current (AC) ratio of 1.15× that maximises inverter loading.
| Bucket | Share | Cost for 1 MW (₹) | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Modules (ALMM tier-1) | ~50% | ₹1.75–₹2.00 cr | 540–620 Wp mono PERC or TOPCon |
| Inverter (string or central) | ~12% | ₹40–₹50 lakh | 1 MW central or 5–8 string units |
| Balance of System (BoS), civil, structure | ~25% | ₹85 lakh–₹1.00 cr | Cabling, transformer, switchgear, mounting |
| EPC margin + commissioning | ~13% | ₹45–₹50 lakh | Design, project management, testing |
| Total | 100% | ₹3.5–₹4.0 cr | ₹35–₹40 per Watt |
A few cost drivers worth flagging. ALMM-listed modules trade at a premium to imported lines; if your project does not require ALMM (some open-access and behind-the-meter rooftop schemes do not), you can shave 8–12% off the module bill. Central inverters are cheaper per kW but string inverters give better partial-shading performance and are easier to replace. BoS is where corner-cutting hurts most over 25 years — galvanised structures, copper Direct Current cabling, and oil-cooled transformers outlast cheaper alternatives by 5–10 years.
Tip — get the Cost-per-Watt benchmark right. A clean turnkey quote for a 1 MW ground-mount in 2026 should land at ₹36–₹38/W including transformer and substation works. Quotes below ₹32/W almost always sub-spec the inverter, structure, or cable cross-section. Quotes above ₹42/W are likely loading EPC margin or including unusual site costs (long evacuation, soil piling). Use this band as your negotiation anchor.
Rooftop 1 MW vs Ground-Mount 1 MW
A 1 MW project lands in one of two physical configurations, and the choice cascades into land cost, evacuation route, tariff structure, and ultimately IRR. Most industrial buyers default to rooftop without realising that a ground-mount IPP build can earn a higher equity IRR through open access. Most HNI investors default to ground-mount without realising that a leased industrial roof can eliminate land risk entirely.
| Parameter | Rooftop 1 MW | Ground-Mount 1 MW |
|---|---|---|
| Land / area required | ~80,000 sq ft of roof | 4–5 acres |
| CAPEX (₹/W) | ₹38–₹42 | ₹35–₹38 |
| Annual generation | 1.4–1.6 mn kWh | 1.5–1.8 mn kWh |
| Primary tariff route | Captive / net metering / OPEX-PPA | Open access / corporate PPA / group captive |
| Tariff range | ₹4.5–₹6.5/kWh effective | ₹3.5–₹5.5/kWh effective |
| Connection cost | Low — behind-the-meter | High — evacuation + substation |
| Permitting time | 4–8 weeks | 4–8 months |
| Best for | Industrial self-consumption | IPP / open access / group captive |
Rooftop wins on permitting speed and connection cost. Ground-mount wins on generation per kW and on the ability to bid into open-access markets. A blended portfolio strategy — rooftop for fast cashflow, ground-mount for portfolio scale — is what most serious 1+ MW investors converge on by Year 3.
Ready to size your 1 MW project? Our commercial team builds investor-grade techno-commercial models for rooftop and ground-mount configurations across Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Karnataka — covering CAPEX, generation, tariff, financing, and exit scenarios. Request a 1 MW project model →
Generation, Capacity Utilisation Factor (CUF), Annual MWh
Capacity Utilisation Factor (CUF) is the single most important physical variable in solar economics. It is the ratio of actual annual generation to theoretical maximum generation if the plant ran at nameplate capacity every hour of the year. A CUF of 17% means a 1 MW plant generates 1 MW × 8,760 hours × 0.17 = 1.49 million kWh in a year. India’s high-irradiance belt sits at 19–21% CUF; the wet eastern and southern coastal belt sits at 15–17%. Your site decides this number more than any other choice.
| Region | Typical CUF | 1 MW annual generation | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rajasthan (Jaisalmer, Bikaner, Pokhran) | 20–21% | 1.75–1.84 mn kWh | Best in India; dust derating 5–7% |
| Gujarat (Kutch, Banaskantha) | 19–20% | 1.66–1.75 mn kWh | Excellent; cyclone wind loading required |
| Andhra Pradesh, Telangana, Karnataka | 18–19% | 1.58–1.66 mn kWh | Solid; medium humidity |
| Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, MP | 17–18% | 1.49–1.58 mn kWh | India average band |
| West Bengal, Odisha, Bihar | 15–16% | 1.31–1.40 mn kWh | Monsoon overcast 90+ days |
| Kerala, NE states | 14–15% | 1.23–1.31 mn kWh | Highest cloud cover; avoid for IPP |
A 1 MW Rajasthan project generates 30–40% more electricity per year than the same kit in West Bengal. That single fact is why IPP capital has clustered in the western belt. For a corporate buyer evaluating a Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) factory in coastal Tamil Nadu, the tariff comparison flips — the lower CUF is offset by higher local retail tariffs and by avoided open-access charges through behind-the-meter captive. Per the Central Electricity Regulatory Commission (CERC) benchmark capital cost order, a 17% CUF is the national norm for tariff determination.
Revenue Model — PPA, Open Access, Group Captive
Once you fix the site and the kit, revenue is decided by which sales route you sign. There are five routes for a 1 MW asset, and the gross tariff varies by almost 2× across them. The investor’s job is to pick the route that maximises risk-adjusted IRR — not just gross tariff.
| Sales route | Effective tariff (₹/kWh) | Counterparty risk | Best for |
|---|---|---|---|
| Utility PPA (SECI/state auction) | ₹2.50–₹3.50 | Low — sovereign-grade | Utility-scale 50+ MW; thin for 1 MW |
| Corporate PPA (direct C&I buyer) | ₹4.50–₹5.00 | Medium — corporate credit | 1–10 MW developer |
| Open access (industrial buyer) | ₹5.00–₹6.00 effective | Medium — buyer + DISCOM charges | Industrial belt with low charges |
| Group captive (≥26% buyer equity) | ₹4.00–₹4.50 effective | Low — captive structure | Tax-efficient C&I portfolios |
| Behind-the-meter captive | Retail tariff offset (₹7–₹10) | None — self-consumption | Industrial rooftop, single-buyer |
For a 1 MW investor without an off-take in hand, the corporate PPA route is the cleanest match — tariffs of ₹4.50–₹5.00/kWh against a creditworthy industrial buyer give a clean 15–18% equity IRR before AD. Open access stretches gross tariff but layers in cross-subsidy surcharge, additional surcharge, banking, and wheeling charges that vary by state and erode 15–25% of the gross. Group captive minimises charges but requires the buyer to take ≥26% equity in the project Special Purpose Vehicle (SPV) — see group captive solar explained for the structuring detail. For the buyer-side comparison of these routes, see how solar PPAs and RESCOs work in India.
Financing Options — IREDA, PFC, REC, Banks
A 1 MW project at ₹3.75 crore is typically financed 70:30 or 75:25 debt:equity. That means ₹2.6–₹2.8 crore of debt and ₹0.95–₹1.15 crore of equity. Four lender categories will quote on it.
| Lender | Loan-to-cost | Interest rate (2026) | Tenure | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IREDA | 70–75% | 9.50–11.00% | 10–12 yrs | Specialist; fastest sanction for clean projects |
| PFC | 70% | 9.75–11.25% | 10–13 yrs | Strong for IPP, prefers 5+ MW |
| REC Limited | 70% | 9.75–11.25% | 10–13 yrs | Similar profile to PFC |
| Commercial banks (SBI, BoB, Axis) | 65–70% | 10.25–11.50% | 8–10 yrs | Quicker for smaller HNI investors |
IREDA is the specialist non-banking financial company for renewable energy and is usually the first port of call for a 1 MW investor. Sanction times of 60–90 days are realistic if your EPC, PPA and land documentation are clean. PFC and REC are dominant for IPP-grade portfolios above 5 MW but will look at clean 1 MW deals with a known off-taker. Commercial banks move faster but quote 50–100 basis points higher. Treat the lender benchmark as a hard input to your IRR model — every 50 basis point cut in debt cost lifts equity IRR by 0.6–0.8 percentage points.
The other financing lever is Accelerated Depreciation (AD). The Income Tax Act allows 40% AD in Year 1 plus an additional 20% under Section 32 in the first half-year of commissioning — together delivering a ~₹1.3–₹1.5 crore Year-1 tax shield against a ₹3.75 crore asset for an investor in the 30%+ tax bracket. This is the single largest IRR enhancer in the model. The detailed mechanics and Section 32 rules are in accelerated depreciation for solar — tax guide.
IRR, NPV, Payback Math
Plugging the variables into a discounted cashflow model produces the headline returns. The table below shows four representative scenarios for a 1 MW investment in Gujarat (CUF 19.5%, 1.71 mn kWh/year), at a corporate PPA tariff of ₹4.75/kWh with 2% annual escalation, ₹0.7 lakh/month O&M, 25-year asset life, and a 10% discount rate for NPV.
| Scenario | Debt:Equity | AD claimed | Equity IRR | NPV (₹ cr) | Payback (yrs) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CAPEX self-fund, full AD | 0:100 | Yes | 17.5% | ₹8.6 | 4.5 |
| CAPEX with IREDA debt, full AD | 70:30 | Yes | 21.8% | ₹7.9 | 4.0 |
| CAPEX self-fund, no AD | 0:100 | No | 13.2% | ₹6.4 | 6.8 |
| OPEX/PPA developer model | 75:25 | Partial | 13.8% | ₹6.1 | 7.5 |
Three takeaways. First, AD lifts equity IRR by ~4 percentage points and shaves 2+ years off payback — it is the single most important Indian tax structuring decision in solar. Second, debt gearing works hard for the CAPEX investor — borrowing at 10% against an asset returning 17% on an unlevered basis lifts equity IRR materially. Third, the OPEX/PPA developer model trades headline returns for lower equity outlay and operational simplicity — useful if you cannot use AD or are pooling capital across investors. The choice between CAPEX and OPEX is structural; read the full comparison in OPEX vs CAPEX solar — which is better in 2026.
Common 1 MW Investor Mistakes
Across the 1 MW projects we have evaluated, financed, or built, investor losses cluster in five repeat patterns. None is technical — all are underwriting errors that show up in Year 2 or Year 3 of operations.
-
1
Overestimating generation. EPC quotes often model generation at 1.8 mn kWh for a site that will realistically yield 1.55 mn kWh after soiling, downtime, grid curtailment, and degradation. Always discount the EPC P50 (median) estimate by 8–10% to get a P90 (90% confidence) figure for lender underwriting.
-
2
Ignoring O&M as a 25-year line. A ₹0.6 lakh/month O&M contract escalating at 5% per year is ~₹3.4 crore in nominal 25-year cost — almost the entire CAPEX. Tight Annual Maintenance Contracts (AMCs) with module cleaning, inverter spares, and performance guarantees are non-negotiable.
-
3
Missing AD timing. AD must be claimed in the year of commissioning. If commissioning slips from March to April, you lose the entire Year-1 tax shield for a full financial year. The IRR penalty can be 2–3 percentage points. Set EPC milestones to lock March commissioning.
-
4
Off-taker credit risk under-priced. A ₹5.50/kWh PPA with a B-rated industrial buyer is worth less than a ₹4.50/kWh PPA with an A-rated buyer once you risk-adjust for default. Demand audited financials, set escrow on receivables, and price counterparty risk into your discount rate.
-
5
Open-access charges modelled at signing only. Cross-subsidy surcharge, additional surcharge, banking and wheeling charges are revised by state regulators every 1–2 years. Model these on a "ratchet" basis with a 4–6% annual escalation, not a flat assumption.
Exit Options — Hold, Sell, Refinance
A 1 MW asset is not a forever decision. By Year 5–7, the project has paid down most of its debt, the equity has been recovered, and the asset is generating clean cashflow against a long-dated PPA. At that point the investor has three exit routes — and the choice depends on portfolio strategy and tax position.
- + Full AD tax shield (~₹1.4 cr Year 1)
- + 17–22% equity IRR
- + Tradeable asset post-Year 5
- + Direct control of operations
- – ₹1+ cr equity outlay per MW
- – O&M risk on investor's balance sheet
- – Tariff and counterparty risk owned
- – Tax shield wasted if AD unusable
- + Zero CAPEX outlay
- + Tariff discount of 25–35% on retail
- + Developer carries O&M risk
- + Easy to scale across multiple sites
- – No AD benefit to buyer
- – Long lock-in (15–25 years)
- – Buy-out clause pricing is complex
- – No terminal asset value
- + Higher gross tariff (₹5–6/kWh)
- + Diversified off-taker base
- + Secondary market liquidity
- + Portfolio-scalable model
- – State surcharges erode 15–25% revenue
- – Banking and wheeling regulatory risk
- – Land + evacuation = 4–8 month timeline
- – Higher transaction friction at exit
By Year 5 the secondary market for operational solar assets in India is active. M&A (mergers and acquisitions) activity through 2024–25 priced operational 1–10 MW portfolios at 6–8× trailing twelve-month EBITDA (Earnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation and Amortisation), depending on PPA tenor, counterparty grade, and CUF. Refinancing — replacing the original IREDA debt with cheaper insurance-company or pension-fund senior debt — is the other lever and can lift equity IRR another 1–2 percentage points without selling the asset.
Verdict. For an HNI or family-office investor with usable tax shield, CAPEX self-fund with 70% IREDA debt and full AD is the highest-IRR structure for a 1 MW project — 18–22% equity IRR, payback under 5 years, and a tradeable asset by Year 5. For an industrial buyer without tax appetite, OPEX/PPA delivers the cleanest balance-sheet outcome and a 25–35% tariff discount with no capital outlay. Open-access IPP is the right structure only above 3–5 MW where surcharge optimisation justifies the regulatory complexity. For the land-owner angle on rural ground-mount, see KUSUM Component A landowner guide.
How Heaven Green Energy Helps 1 MW Investors
Heaven Green Energy delivers turnkey 1 MW projects across India — investor-grade techno-commercial modelling, ALMM-listed tier-1 supply, IREDA/PFC debt syndication support, and 25-year O&M. Our commercial team has built and operates 1–20 MW projects across Rajasthan, Gujarat, Maharashtra, and Karnataka, and underwrites every 1 MW project on the 7-Variable Model.
- Site assessment, irradiance modelling, and bankable P50/P90 generation reports.
- EPC delivery at ₹36–₹38/W with full transformer, switchgear, and substation scope.
- Lender introductions across IREDA, PFC, REC, and commercial banks.
- AD tax structuring co-ordinated with your CA and tax adviser.
- PPA negotiation support with corporate off-takers and open-access intermediaries.
- 25-year AMC with module cleaning, inverter spares, and uptime guarantees.
Explore the services that match your 1 MW plan:
- Commercial Solar — 100 kW to 5 MW rooftop and behind-the-meter projects.
- Industrial Solar — captive, open access, and group captive for 1 MW+ industrial loads.
- Ground-Mount Solar Park — 1–50 MW IPP-grade ground-mount EPC and operations.
- Solar EPC Services — turnkey EPC for any 1 MW configuration.
For the financing-structure comparison most investors ask us next, read OPEX vs CAPEX which is better in 2026.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the all-in cost of a 1 MW solar plant in India in 2026?
A 1 MW solar plant in India in 2026 costs ₹3.5–₹4 crore on a turnkey EPC basis, equivalent to ₹35–₹40 per Watt. Modules account for ~50% of CAPEX (₹1.75–₹2 cr), inverters ~12% (₹40–₹50 lakh), balance of system and civil works ~25% (₹85 lakh–₹1 cr), and EPC margin and commissioning ~13% (₹45–₹50 lakh). Quotes below ₹32/W usually sub-spec components; quotes above ₹42/W are loaded with margin or unusual site cost.
How much electricity does a 1 MW solar plant generate per year in India?
A 1 MW solar plant generates 1.5–1.7 million kWh per year in India, depending on site irradiance. Rajasthan and Gujarat hit 1.7–1.85 mn kWh at 19–21% Capacity Utilisation Factor. The national average is 17–18% CUF or 1.49–1.58 mn kWh. Coastal Tamil Nadu and central states deliver 1.4–1.5 mn kWh. West Bengal, Odisha, and Kerala fall to 1.2–1.4 mn kWh due to high cloud cover and monsoon overcast.
What IRR can an investor expect from a 1 MW solar plant?
A CAPEX investor claiming Accelerated Depreciation can target 17–22% equity IRR over 25 years on a 1 MW solar plant with 70% IREDA debt and a corporate PPA tariff of ₹4.50–₹5.00 per kWh. Without AD, equity IRR drops to 12–15%. OPEX/PPA developer models clear at 12–15% IRR. NPV at a 10% discount rate sits at ₹6–₹9 crore positive for good-irradiance sites in Gujarat or Rajasthan.
What is the payback period for a 1 MW solar plant in India?
Payback for a 1 MW solar plant is 4–6 years with Accelerated Depreciation claimed in Year 1, and 6–8 years without AD. The headline AD benefit at 40% in Year 1 plus 20% additional under Section 32 delivers a ~₹1.3–₹1.5 crore tax shield against a ₹3.75 crore asset for a 30%+ tax-bracket investor — this alone shaves 2+ years off payback. Higher-CUF sites in Rajasthan and Gujarat achieve the shorter end of the range.
How much land does a 1 MW ground-mount solar plant need?
A 1 MW ground-mount solar plant in India needs 4–5 acres (roughly 16,000–20,000 square metres) of relatively flat, unshaded land. Land requirement varies with module efficiency, tilt angle, and inter-row spacing — TOPCon 620 Wp modules with single-axis trackers can pack into 4 acres, while older mono-PERC modules on fixed tilt need 5 acres. Land tenure for a 25-year IPP project is usually a long-term lease or outright purchase.
Can a 1 MW solar plant qualify for the PM Suryaghar subsidy?
No — PM Suryaghar: Muft Bijli Yojana is capped at 10 kW for residential consumers and 500 kW per applicant for group housing common-area loads. A 1 MW system is outside the residential scheme. Investor-scale 1 MW projects access concessional finance through IREDA, PFC, and REC, and tax structuring through Accelerated Depreciation rather than direct subsidy. Some state policies (Gujarat’s Solar Power Policy, for instance) extend wheeling and banking concessions to behind-the-meter captive plants.
What are the financing terms available from IREDA for a 1 MW solar plant?
IREDA, India’s specialist renewable energy lender, funds 70–75% of project cost for grid-connected solar projects at interest rates of 9.50–11.00% in 2026, with tenures of 10–12 years and a 1-year moratorium on principal repayment. Sanction times of 60–90 days are realistic for clean projects with executed land documents, a creditworthy off-taker, and an EPC contract with a tier-1 contractor. PFC and REC offer similar terms; commercial banks come in at 65–70% loan-to-cost and 50–100 basis points higher rates.
Is a 1 MW solar plant eligible for Accelerated Depreciation under Indian tax law?
Yes — a 1 MW solar plant qualifies for Accelerated Depreciation at 40% per year on the Written Down Value basis under the Income Tax Act, plus an additional depreciation of 20% in the first year for plant commissioned in the first half of the financial year. The combined Year-1 deduction is ~40% of asset cost, delivering a tax shield of ₹1.3–₹1.5 crore against a ₹3.75 crore project for a 30%+ tax-bracket investor. AD must be claimed in the year of commissioning — slipping from March to April postpones the entire Year-1 shield.
What are the exit options for a 1 MW solar plant investor?
Three exit options exist for a 1 MW solar plant. Hold — operate through the 25-year PPA and collect annuity-like cashflow. Sell — secondary-market trades of operational 1–10 MW portfolios priced at 6–8× trailing twelve-month EBITDA through 2024–25, depending on PPA tenor and counterparty grade. Refinance — replace IREDA debt with cheaper insurance-company or pension-fund debt at Year 5–7, lifting equity IRR another 1–2 percentage points without selling. M&A activity in the Indian operational solar segment remains strong.